Skip to content
Justice is live.
Live NowRecentTrialsWatch PartiesThe JC
Create courtroomSign in
Trial Empire. Justice is live
AboutEmpire CoinsCase guidesSources & correctionsCommunity guidelinesPrivacyTerms
A better front-row seat.

Allow Google Analytics cookies to help us understand page visits, signups, trial follows and first chat participation. Your chat messages and account details stay out of analytics. Privacy

Take your seat
© 2026 Trial Empire. Run by Wild. Every trial. One empire.Independent community. Not affiliated with courts or official juries.
Courtrooms/CLOSING ARGUMENTS: Buried Beneath the Snow Trial — WI v. Timothy Hauschultz — Day 6

CLOSING ARGUMENTS: Buried Beneath the Snow Trial — WI v. Timothy Hauschultz — Day 6

ReplayLaw&Crime Trials

Source: Law&Crime TrialsOriginal on YouTube

Jury Duty

Not guilty
—/100
Guilty
Audience
average
—/100Loading…Loading…
Not guiltyGuilty
50/100
Loading…
Audience opinion only

Chat

Connecting…
Opening the courtroom…

Opening today’s conversation…

THE CASE FILEResearched Oct 17, 2026

Timothy Hauschultz · The death of Ethan

Shared case background · not a recap of this recording

Timothy Hauschultz faces charges arising from the death of his seven-year-old great-nephew Ethan in Wisconsin. Prosecutors allege that a punishment involving a heavy log and supervision by Hauschultz’s teenage son led to the child’s death. [1]

Where
Manitowoc County, Wisconsin. [1]
Charge context
The prosecution includes felony murder and child-abuse allegations. [1]

What to listen for

  • The case examines who ordered the punishment and responsibility for the conduct that followed. [1]
  • Distinguish allegations in the complaint from testimony and findings made in court. [1]

Bring it to the chat

What evidence establishes who directed the punishment?

How does the testimony distinguish each person’s actions?

Watch together. Talk it through.
Sources & research notes 1 source

Case background may include developments after this recording. This is a summary of the linked reporting, not a transcript or a live case-status feed. Discussion questions are prompts, not factual claims.

  1. Court TV · Charges and pretrial background

Courtroom footage may contain disturbing testimony. Allegations are not findings of guilt.

More from the archive

Archive
Closing arguments

YELLA BEEZY/MO3 MURDER FOR HIRE TRIAL CLOSING ARGUMENTS 📱

The What Up $Doe Show

Join the conversation
Archive
Closing arguments

YELLA BEEZY/MO3 MURDER FOR HIRE TRIAL CLOSING ARGUMENTS

The What Up $Doe Show

Join the conversation
Archive
Closing arguments

NARESH BHATT TRIAL: CLOSING ARGUMENTS BEGIN! WILL THE JURY DELIVER A GUILTY VERDICT?

Sincity with Brittany

Join the conversation
Archive
Closing arguments

Naresh Bhatt Trial: Closing Arguments Defence

Dark Triad True Crime

Join the conversation